Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:26 UTC
IC Memo — UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 33 beds | Grade B | EBITDA uplift $8.8M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 460019 | DUCHESNE, UT | 33 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
B
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER is a 33-bed suburban community hospital in DUCHESNE, UT with $119.9M in net patient revenue and a 1.8% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 17.3% Medicare, 25.3% Medicaid, and 57.3% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $8.8M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 1.8% to 9.2% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$119.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$2.2M
Operating Margin COMPUTED1.8%
Occupancy HCRIS29.9%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$3.6M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS48.8%
Distress Probability ML55.9%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
27
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of 1.8% places it below the state median. Among 27 size-comparable peers (16-66 beds), the median margin is 4.9%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (16-66), prioritizing same-state peers. 27 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER (Target)UT33$119.9M1.8%
CEDAR CITY HOSPITALUT48$136.8M31.4%
LONE PEAK HOSPITALUT61$133.1M25.2%
ALTA VIEW HOSPITALUT57$130.9M-0.6%
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALUT25$130.4M-6.4%
LAYTON HOSPITALUT37$121.1M9.5%
PARK CITY HOSPITALUT37$120.8M13.7%
MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTERUT36$96.1M38.5%
THE ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALTY HOSPIUT40$88.7M12.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $8.8M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.5M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$2.4M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$2.4M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.5M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$77K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.5M
Cost to Collect
$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction
$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate
$77K
Total EBITDA Uplift$8.8M
Current EBITDA$2.2M
+ RCM Uplift+$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA$11.0M
Current Margin1.8%
Pro Forma Margin9.2%
WC Released (1x)$4.6M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$3.4M$102.7M30.60x98.2%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$3.4M$114.0M33.99x102.4%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$3.0M$144.2M47.78x116.7%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$3.0M$158.2M52.41x120.7%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$3.7M$57.4M15.56x73.2%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$3.7M$64.4M17.45x77.1%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (25.3%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 29.9%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 55.9% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 27 hospitals with 16-66 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=28)
  • Comp margins: P25=-10.6% / P50=4.9% / P75=14.1%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.