Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 460019 | UT | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $8.5M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$119.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$368K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$600K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$594K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$486K$973K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.7x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.6x105% / 36.3x
9.0x87% / 23.1x92% / 26.0x96% / 28.9x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x
10.0x83% / 20.5x87% / 23.1x91% / 25.7x93% / 27.1x95% / 28.4x
11.0x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.7x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.5x
12.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
67%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 67% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M1.8%
Year 1$2.2M+$4.2M$6.5M5.4%
Year 2$2.3M+$6.3M$8.6M7.2%
Year 3$2.4M+$6.3M$8.7M7.2%
Year 4$2.5M+$6.3M$8.8M7.3%
Year 5$2.5M+$6.3M$8.8M7.4%
$21.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$97.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$75.4M
Value Created
$8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$63.1M
RCM Value Creation
$8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$730K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$58K$77K$92K
Total$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-9.7%4.6%13.9%
P43
Net-to-Gross48.8%39.0%46.3%64.8%
P54
Occupancy29.9%24.3%30.1%47.1%
P46
Rev/Bed$3.6M$537K$1.9M$2.6M
P93
Exp/Bed$3.6M$735K$1.5M$2.3M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML