Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — LIVINGSTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:11 UTC
IC Memo — LIVINGSTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | TN | 90 beds | Grade D | EBITDA uplift $3.0M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

LIVINGSTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL

CCN 440187 | OVERTON, TN | 90 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
D
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

LIVINGSTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL is a 90-bed under-performing / distressed in OVERTON, TN with $40.5M in net patient revenue and a -5.1% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 33.3% Medicare, 17.8% Medicaid, and 48.9% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $3.0M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -5.1% to 2.3% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$40.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-2.1M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-5.1%
Occupancy HCRIS17.4%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$450K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS17.8%
Distress Probability ML59.0%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

141
TN Hospitals
-0.6%
State Median Margin
57
Comparable Hospitals

TN has 141 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -0.6%. The target's margin of -5.1% places it below the state median. Among 57 size-comparable peers (45-180 beds), the median margin is 0.6%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (45-180), prioritizing same-state peers. 57 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
LIVINGSTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL (Target)TN90$40.5M-5.1%
BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITALTN145$326.0M-8.5%
METRO NASHVILLE GENERAL HOSPITTN114$287.4M48.9%
TRISTAR HENDERSONVILLE MEDICALTN129$208.6M41.5%
TRISTAR STONECREST MEDICAL CENTN115$190.0M39.5%
BAPTIST MEM HOSPITAL TIPTON COTN48$179.0M-5.8%
SKYRIDGE MEDICAL CENTERTN176$163.5M17.3%
SUMNER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERTN138$161.9M-2.7%
VANDERBILT WILSON COUNTY HOSPITN113$158.7M-7.1%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $3.0M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$850K+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$810K+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$802K+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$493K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$26K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$850K
Cost to Collect
$810K
Denial Rate Reduction
$802K
A/R Days Reduction
$493K
Clean Claim Rate
$26K
Total EBITDA Uplift$3.0M
Current EBITDA$-2.1M
+ RCM Uplift+$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA$915K
Current Margin-5.1%
Pro Forma Margin2.3%
WC Released (1x)$1.6M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-3.2M$16.2M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-3.2M$16.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-2.9M$25.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-2.9M$27.0M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-3.5M$2.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-3.5M$1.4M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 17.4%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 59.0% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 57 hospitals with 45-180 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=58)
  • Comp margins: P25=-8.5% / P50=0.6% / P75=12.7%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.