Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — OU MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:04 UTC
IC Memo — OU MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | OK | 819 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $121.2M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

OU MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 370093 | nan, OK | 819 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

OU MEDICAL CENTER is a 819-bed large academic medical center in nan, OK with $1.65B in net patient revenue and a 4.6% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 15.9% Medicare, 46.4% Medicaid, and 37.6% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $121.2M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 4.6% to 12.0% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$1.65B
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$76.5M
Operating Margin COMPUTED4.6%
Occupancy HCRIS73.2%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$2.0M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS16.5%
Distress Probability ML52.5%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

147
OK Hospitals
-8.8%
State Median Margin
382
Comparable Hospitals

OK has 147 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -8.8%. The target's margin of 4.6% places it above the state median. Among 382 size-comparable peers (410-1638 beds), the median margin is -4.9%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (410-1638), prioritizing same-state peers. 382 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
OU MEDICAL CENTER (Target)OK819$1.65B4.6%
ST. LUKES HOSPITALPA633$8.94B87.9%
NYU LANGONE HOSPITALSNY1618$7.24B-7.8%
STANFORD HEALTH CARECA657$6.76B3.7%
CLEVELAND CLINIC HOSPITALOH1326$6.38B-17.7%
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL TN1084$5.44B-15.9%
UCSF MEDICAL CENTERCA834$5.44B-5.4%
UT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERTX721$4.90B-0.8%
UNIV OF MI HOSPITALS & HLTH CTMI951$4.62B-1.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $121.2M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$34.6M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$32.9M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$32.6M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$20.0M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$1.1M+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$34.6M
Cost to Collect
$32.9M
Denial Rate Reduction
$32.6M
A/R Days Reduction
$20.0M
Clean Claim Rate
$1.1M
Total EBITDA Uplift$121.2M
Current EBITDA$76.5M
+ RCM Uplift+$121.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA$197.7M
Current Margin4.6%
Pro Forma Margin12.0%
WC Released (1x)$63.2M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$117.6M$1.72B14.59x70.9%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$117.6M$1.93B16.38x74.9%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$105.9M$2.36B22.33x86.1%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$105.9M$2.61B24.66x89.8%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$129.4M$1.07B8.29x52.6%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$129.4M$1.22B9.44x56.7%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (46.4%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 52.5% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 382 hospitals with 410-1638 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=6)
  • Comp margins: P25=-15.1% / P50=-4.9% / P75=3.2%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.