Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OU MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OU MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370093 | OK | 819 beds | Current EBITDA $76.5M → Pro Forma $163.1M (+$86.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.65B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$76.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$86.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$163.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$63.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$86.6M
Modeled Uplift
$58.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$28.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $58.5M (vs $86.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$32.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$32.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$20.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.1M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$86.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$32.9M$32.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$31.7M$906K$32.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.1M$15.0M$20.0M$63.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$8.2M$16.5M$24.7M$32.9M$32.9M$32.9M$32.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$8.2M$16.3M$24.5M$32.6M$32.6M$32.6M$32.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.7M$13.4M$20.0M$20.0M$20.0M$20.0M$20.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$527K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Cumulative$0$23.6M$47.2M$70.2M$86.6M$86.6M$86.6M$86.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $86.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
9.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x
10.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
11.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
12.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
39%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 39% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$76.5M$76.5M4.6%
Year 1$78.8M+$57.8M$136.5M8.3%
Year 2$81.1M+$86.6M$167.8M10.2%
Year 3$83.6M+$86.6M$170.2M10.3%
Year 4$86.1M+$86.6M$172.7M10.5%
Year 5$88.6M+$86.6M$175.3M10.6%
$764.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.93B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.16B
Value Created
$175.3M
Exit EBITDA
$121.8M
Organic Growth
$866.3M
RCM Value Creation
$175.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$16.5M$24.7M$32.9M$39.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$16.3M$24.5M$32.6M$39.1M
A/R Days Reduction$10.0M$15.0M$20.0M$24.0M
Clean Claim Rate$527K$790K$1.1M$1.3M
Total$43.3M$65.0M$86.6M$104.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 383 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.6%-15.1%-4.8%3.3%
P78
Net-to-Gross16.5%20.4%26.7%31.7%
P13
Occupancy73.2%67.6%75.7%83.6%
P40
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.4M$1.8M$2.4M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML