Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
IC Memo — BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | OK | 75 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $7.1M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER

CCN 370016 | GARFIELD, OK | 75 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER is a 75-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in GARFIELD, OK with $96.7M in net patient revenue and a -18.6% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 32.0% Medicare, 32.4% Medicaid, and 35.7% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $7.1M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -18.6% to -11.2% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$96.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-18.0M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-18.6%
Occupancy HCRIS37.0%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.3M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS17.1%
Distress Probability ML56.7%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

147
OK Hospitals
-8.8%
State Median Margin
58
Comparable Hospitals

OK has 147 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -8.8%. The target's margin of -18.6% places it below the state median. Among 58 size-comparable peers (38-150 beds), the median margin is -3.3%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (38-150), prioritizing same-state peers. 58 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER (Target)OK75$96.7M-18.6%
OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITALOK97$342.0M-2.8%
STILLWATER MEDICAL CENTEROK52$270.2M-9.9%
SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL SOUTHOK104$198.3M34.4%
ST ANTHONY SHAWNEE HOSPITALOK57$169.2M-6.1%
MCBRIDE CLINIC ORTHOPEDIC HOSPOK68$166.9M-5.0%
MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMOREOK140$158.8M-1.1%
OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL SOUTHOK43$148.5M-0.6%
OKLAHOMA SURGICAL HOSPITALOK74$146.2M17.7%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $7.1M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.0M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.9M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.9M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.2M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$62K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.0M
Cost to Collect
$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate
$62K
Total EBITDA Uplift$7.1M
Current EBITDA$-18.0M
+ RCM Uplift+$7.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-10.9M
Current Margin-18.6%
Pro Forma Margin-11.2%
WC Released (1x)$3.7M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-27.7M$-47.4M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-27.7M$-61.1M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-24.9M$-46.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-24.9M$-58.2M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-30.4M$-74.0M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-30.4M$-91.3M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (32.4%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 56.7% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 58 hospitals with 38-150 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=59)
  • Comp margins: P25=-16.8% / P50=-3.3% / P75=6.1%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.