Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
IC Memo — NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | MT | 49 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $6.9M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL

CCN 270032 | HILL, MT | 49 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL is a 49-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in HILL, MT with $93.3M in net patient revenue and a -4.7% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 40.9% Medicare, 38.0% Medicaid, and 21.2% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $6.9M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -4.7% to 2.7% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$93.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-4.3M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-4.7%
Occupancy HCRIS22.2%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.9M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS45.3%
Distress Probability ML63.7%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

66
MT Hospitals
-9.6%
State Median Margin
33
Comparable Hospitals

MT has 66 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -9.6%. The target's margin of -4.7% places it above the state median. Among 33 size-comparable peers (24-98 beds), the median margin is -7.4%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (24-98), prioritizing same-state peers. 33 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL (Target)MT49$93.3M-4.7%
SAINT JAMES HEALTHCAREMT69$164.5M-7.9%
MARCUS DALY MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT25$107.6M-1.3%
LOGAN HEALTH WHITEFISHMT25$101.8M13.8%
SIDNEY HEALTH CENTERMT25$95.2M-6.3%
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANACONDAMT25$89.0M1.3%
LIVINGSTON HEALTHCAREMT25$72.6M-7.1%
HOLY ROSARY HEALTHCAREMT25$67.3M1.3%
GLENDIVE MEDICAL CENTER INCMT25$52.6M-6.8%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $6.9M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.0M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.9M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.8M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.1M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$60K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.0M
Cost to Collect
$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate
$60K
Total EBITDA Uplift$6.9M
Current EBITDA$-4.3M
+ RCM Uplift+$6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA$2.5M
Current Margin-4.7%
Pro Forma Margin2.7%
WC Released (1x)$3.6M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-6.7M$40.0M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-6.7M$41.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-6.0M$62.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-6.0M$66.2M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-7.3M$7.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-7.3M$6.3M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (38.0%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 22.2%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 63.7% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 33 hospitals with 24-98 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=34)
  • Comp margins: P25=-18.8% / P50=-7.4% / P75=-1.2%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.