Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
IC Memo — BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | IN | 54 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $3.0M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 150075 | WELLS, IN | 54 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a 54-bed suburban community hospital in WELLS, IN with $40.2M in net patient revenue and a -2.9% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 34.1% Medicare, 5.4% Medicaid, and 60.4% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $3.0M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -2.9% to 4.4% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$40.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-1.2M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-2.9%
Occupancy HCRIS26.2%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$745K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS18.8%
Distress Probability ML53.5%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

171
IN Hospitals
-1.1%
State Median Margin
71
Comparable Hospitals

IN has 171 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -1.1%. The target's margin of -2.9% places it below the state median. Among 71 size-comparable peers (27-108 beds), the median margin is -0.3%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (27-108), prioritizing same-state peers. 71 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENT (Target)IN54$40.2M-2.9%
MEMORIAL HOSP & HEALTH CARE CTIN96$259.1M28.7%
GOSHEN HOSPITALIN103$248.4M-22.8%
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITALIN99$233.1M-12.9%
INDIANA ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL LIN38$196.8M31.2%
ST. VINCENT HEART CENTERIN107$195.3M32.4%
LAPORTE HOSPITALIN74$192.4M19.3%
SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTERIN60$184.2M-0.8%
MARION GENERAL HOSPITALIN106$183.5M-14.6%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $3.0M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$845K+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$805K+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$796K+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$489K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$26K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$845K
Cost to Collect
$805K
Denial Rate Reduction
$796K
A/R Days Reduction
$489K
Clean Claim Rate
$26K
Total EBITDA Uplift$3.0M
Current EBITDA$-1.2M
+ RCM Uplift+$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA$1.8M
Current Margin-2.9%
Pro Forma Margin4.4%
WC Released (1x)$1.5M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-1.8M$21.8M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-1.8M$23.4M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-1.6M$32.5M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-1.6M$35.0M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-2.0M$7.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-2.0M$7.7M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 26.2%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 53.5% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 71 hospitals with 27-108 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=72)
  • Comp margins: P25=-11.7% / P50=-0.3% / P75=15.0%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.