Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLUFFTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 150075 | IN | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $930K (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$930K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$803K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$805K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$796K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$489K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$805K$805K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$774K$22K$796K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$123K$366K$489K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$201K$402K$603K$805K$805K$805K$805K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$199K$398K$597K$796K$796K$796K$796K
A/R Days Reduction$0$163K$326K$489K$489K$489K$489K$489K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$576K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-10.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
17.3x
Headroom (turns)
266%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 266% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -10.8x, adding 109.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-2.9%
Year 1$-1.2M+$1.4M$189K0.5%
Year 2$-1.3M+$2.1M$858K2.1%
Year 3$-1.3M+$2.1M$820K2.0%
Year 4$-1.3M+$2.1M$781K1.9%
Year 5$-1.4M+$2.1M$741K1.8%
$-11.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.0M
Value Created
$741K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$21.2M
RCM Value Creation
$741K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$402K$603K$805K$965K
Denial Rate Reductio$398K$597K$796K$956K
A/R Days Reduction$245K$367K$489K$587K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.9%-11.7%-0.8%14.7%
P42
Net-to-Gross18.8%26.1%31.8%38.0%
P7
Occupancy26.2%33.5%52.4%68.9%
P10
Rev/Bed$745K$360K$830K$2.0M
P48
Exp/Bed$767K$347K$770K$1.9M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML