Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — OSF HEART OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 16:37 UTC
IC Memo — OSF HEART OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | IL | 179 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $7.3M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

OSF HEART OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 140113 | CHAMPAIGN, IL | 179 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

OSF HEART OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER is a 179-bed under-performing / distressed in CHAMPAIGN, IL with $98.8M in net patient revenue and a -32.1% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 28.2% Medicare, 5.9% Medicaid, and 65.9% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $7.3M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -32.1% to -24.7% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$98.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-31.7M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-32.1%
Occupancy HCRIS22.9%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$552K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS22.6%
Distress Probability ML55.3%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

208
IL Hospitals
-5.3%
State Median Margin
98
Comparable Hospitals

IL has 208 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -5.3%. The target's margin of -32.1% places it below the state median. Among 98 size-comparable peers (90-358 beds), the median margin is -7.6%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (90-358), prioritizing same-state peers. 98 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
OSF HEART OF MARY MEDICAL CENT (Target)IL179$98.8M-32.1%
CENTRAL DUPAGE HOSPITALIL347$1.30B16.4%
SWEDISHAMERICAN HOSPITALIL324$752.0M-2.8%
ADVOCATE NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTIL233$713.2M18.5%
NORTHERN ILLINOIS MEDICAL CENTIL259$640.9M-12.5%
BLESSING HOSPITALIL309$522.4M-13.2%
NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPIIL124$494.3M-13.8%
SILVER CROSS HOSPITALIL296$479.7M-1.1%
ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTEIL282$474.5M-4.7%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $7.3M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.1M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$2.0M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$2.0M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.2M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$63K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.1M
Cost to Collect
$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction
$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate
$63K
Total EBITDA Uplift$7.3M
Current EBITDA$-31.7M
+ RCM Uplift+$7.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-24.4M
Current Margin-32.1%
Pro Forma Margin-24.7%
WC Released (1x)$3.8M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-48.7M$-136.2M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-48.7M$-165.7M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-43.9M$-157.5M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-43.9M$-184.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-53.6M$-156.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-53.6M$-189.9M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 22.9%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 55.3% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 98 hospitals with 90-358 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=99)
  • Comp margins: P25=-19.8% / P50=-7.6% / P75=3.5%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.