Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — ST. MARYS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:55 UTC
IC Memo — ST. MARYS HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | CT | 163 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $22.9M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

ST. MARYS HOSPITAL

CCN 070016 | NEW HAVEN, CT | 163 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

ST. MARYS HOSPITAL is a 163-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in NEW HAVEN, CT with $311.2M in net patient revenue and a -2.5% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 26.9% Medicare, 29.8% Medicaid, and 43.3% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $22.9M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -2.5% to 4.9% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$311.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-7.7M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-2.5%
Occupancy HCRIS56.7%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.9M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS30.0%
Distress Probability ML52.1%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

39
CT Hospitals
-6.8%
State Median Margin
20
Comparable Hospitals

CT has 39 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -6.8%. The target's margin of -2.5% places it above the state median. Among 20 size-comparable peers (82-326 beds), the median margin is -6.7%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (82-326), prioritizing same-state peers. 20 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
ST. MARYS HOSPITAL (Target)CT163$311.2M-2.5%
THE STAMFORD HOSPITALCT288$786.2M-5.1%
JOHN DEMPSEY HOSPITALCT141$590.3M-24.8%
THE HOSPITAL OF CENTRAL CONNECCT244$541.8M-5.6%
GREENWICH HOSPITALCT186$498.0M-5.9%
ST. VINCENTS MEDICAL CENTERCT211$481.3M-12.7%
MIDDLESEX HOSPITALCT186$449.7M-1.3%
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITALCT236$422.7M-6.7%
CONNECTICUT CHILDRENS MEDICAL CT187$416.8M-6.7%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $22.9M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$6.5M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$6.2M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$6.2M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$3.8M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$199K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$6.5M
Cost to Collect
$6.2M
Denial Rate Reduction
$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction
$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate
$199K
Total EBITDA Uplift$22.9M
Current EBITDA$-7.7M
+ RCM Uplift+$22.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA$15.2M
Current Margin-2.5%
Pro Forma Margin4.9%
WC Released (1x)$11.9M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-11.8M$178.6M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-11.8M$192.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-10.6M$264.4M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-10.6M$285.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-13.0M$67.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-13.0M$70.4M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (29.8%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 52.1% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 20 hospitals with 82-326 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=21)
  • Comp margins: P25=-12.4% / P50=-6.7% / P75=-5.5%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.