Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — MARICOPA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
IC Memo — MARICOPA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | AZ | 9 beds | Grade D | EBITDA uplift $665K
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

MARICOPA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

CCN 030152 | PINAL, AZ | 9 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
D
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

MARICOPA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL is a 9-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in PINAL, AZ with $8.9M in net patient revenue and a 6.5% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 16.0% Medicare, 28.4% Medicaid, and 55.6% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $665K in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 6.5% to 13.9% (+744bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$579K
Operating Margin COMPUTED6.5%
Occupancy HCRIS9.3%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$993K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS7.1%
Distress Probability ML60.4%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

124
AZ Hospitals
-0.8%
State Median Margin
483
Comparable Hospitals

AZ has 124 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -0.8%. The target's margin of 6.5% places it above the state median. Among 483 size-comparable peers (4-18 beds), the median margin is -8.4%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (4-18), prioritizing same-state peers. 483 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
MARICOPA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (Target)AZ9$8.9M6.5%
WENATCHEE VALLEY HOSPITALWA11$277.5M-4.9%
PORTERVILLE DEVELOPMENTAL CENTCA17$193.6M-6.0%
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHCO13$150.4M-50.0%
NORTON SOUND REGIONAL HOSPITALAK18$148.7M-28.6%
FRANCISCAN HEALTH HAMMONDIN10$117.7M-4.3%
NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARYNY15$112.8M-28.0%
OAK LEAF SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLCWI13$109.8M34.1%
SOUTHERN MONO HEALTH CARE DISTCA17$99.1M4.1%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $665K (744bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$188K+210bp18mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$180K+202bp12mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$179K+200bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$109K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$10K+11bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$188K
Denial Rate Reduction
$180K
Cost to Collect
$179K
A/R Days Reduction
$109K
Clean Claim Rate
$10K
Total EBITDA Uplift$665K
Current EBITDA$579K
+ RCM Uplift+$665K
Pro Forma EBITDA$1.2M
Current Margin6.5%
Pro Forma Margin13.9%
WC Released (1x)$343K

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$891K$10.5M11.75x63.7%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$891K$11.8M13.24x67.7%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$802K$14.3M17.81x77.9%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$802K$15.8M19.73x81.6%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$981K$6.9M6.99x47.5%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$981K$7.9M8.02x51.6%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (28.4%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 9.3%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 60.4% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 483 hospitals with 4-18 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=9)
  • Comp margins: P25=-25.1% / P50=-8.4% / P75=2.5%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.