Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — SAMUEL SIMMONDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:28 UTC
IC Memo — SAMUEL SIMMONDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | AK | 10 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $4.3M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

SAMUEL SIMMONDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

CCN 021312 | NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, AK | 10 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

SAMUEL SIMMONDS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL is a 10-bed under-performing / distressed in NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, AK with $57.8M in net patient revenue and a -81.7% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 40.2% Medicare, 30.8% Medicaid, and 29.0% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $4.3M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -81.7% to -74.3% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$57.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-47.2M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-81.7%
Occupancy HCRIS32.4%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$5.8M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS61.1%
Distress Probability ML55.8%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

24
AK Hospitals
-2.1%
State Median Margin
616
Comparable Hospitals

AK has 24 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -2.1%. The target's margin of -81.7% places it below the state median. Among 616 size-comparable peers (5-20 beds), the median margin is -8.7%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (5-20), prioritizing same-state peers. 616 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
SAMUEL SIMMONDS MEMORIAL HOSPI (Target)AK10$57.8M-81.7%
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTERWA20$1.17B-50.0%
WENATCHEE VALLEY HOSPITALWA11$277.5M-4.9%
PORTERVILLE DEVELOPMENTAL CENTCA17$193.6M-6.0%
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHCO13$150.4M-50.0%
NORTON SOUND REGIONAL HOSPITALAK18$148.7M-28.6%
TEXAS SPINE AND JOINT HOSPITALTX20$147.3M30.3%
GREAT FALLS CLINIC MEDICAL CENMT20$132.1M21.0%
MARSHFIELD MEDICAL CENTER-MINOWI19$129.6M-12.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $4.3M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.2M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.2M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.1M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$704K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$37K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.2M
Cost to Collect
$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction
$704K
Clean Claim Rate
$37K
Total EBITDA Uplift$4.3M
Current EBITDA$-47.2M
+ RCM Uplift+$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-43.0M
Current Margin-81.7%
Pro Forma Margin-74.3%
WC Released (1x)$2.2M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-72.7M$-269.1M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-72.7M$-319.6M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-65.4M$-329.1M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-65.4M$-378.4M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-80.0M$-266.7M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-80.0M$-319.4M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (30.8%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 32.4%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 55.8% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 616 hospitals with 5-20 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=9)
  • Comp margins: P25=-24.1% / P50=-8.7% / P75=2.2%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.