Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOGALUSA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOGALUSA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 713026 | LA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $110K → Pro Forma $343K (+$233K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$110K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$233K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$343K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+557bps
Margin Improvement
$161K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$233K
Modeled Uplift
$170K
Risk-Adjusted
-$63K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$89K
+212bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$84K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$51K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+23bp
Total EBITDA Impact$233K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$81K$8K$89K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$84K$84K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$13K$38K$51K$161K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$22K$44K$67K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cost to Collect$0$21K$42K$63K$84K$84K$84K$84K
A/R Days Reduction$0$17K$34K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$65K$130K$190K$233K$233K$233K$233K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $233K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.4x96% / 28.8x
9.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.5x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.2x
10.0x74% / 16.0x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x
11.0x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x
12.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$110K$110K2.6%
Year 1$113K+$156K$269K6.4%
Year 2$116K+$233K$350K8.3%
Year 3$120K+$233K$353K8.4%
Year 4$124K+$233K$357K8.5%
Year 5$127K+$233K$361K8.6%
$1.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.9M
Value Created
$361K
Exit EBITDA
$175K
Organic Growth
$2.3M
RCM Value Creation
$361K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$44K$67K$89K$107K
Cost to Collect$42K$63K$84K$101K
A/R Days Reduction$25K$38K$51K$61K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$117K$175K$233K$280K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-4.6%4.1%17.0%
P43
Net-to-Gross29.8%37.9%49.3%66.4%
P17
Occupancy64.3%20.6%51.5%79.1%
P59
Rev/Bed$419K$337K$658K$1.0M
P37
Exp/Bed$408K$290K$422K$956K
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML