Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRUSTPOINT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL O 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRUSTPOINT REHABILITATION HOSPITAL O
CCN 673063 | TX | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $4.1M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$606K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$800K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$792K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$487K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$800K$800K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$770K$22K$792K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$123K$364K$487K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$200K$400K$600K$800K$800K$800K$800K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$198K$396K$594K$792K$792K$792K$792K
A/R Days Reduction$0$162K$325K$487K$487K$487K$487K$487K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$573K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.1M$4.1M10.3%
Year 1$4.2M+$1.4M$5.6M14.1%
Year 2$4.4M+$2.1M$6.5M16.2%
Year 3$4.5M+$2.1M$6.6M16.5%
Year 4$4.6M+$2.1M$6.7M16.8%
Year 5$4.8M+$2.1M$6.9M17.2%
$41.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$75.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.5M
Value Created
$6.9M
Exit EBITDA
$6.6M
Organic Growth
$21.0M
RCM Value Creation
$6.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$400K$600K$800K$960K
Denial Rate Reductio$396K$594K$792K$951K
A/R Days Reduction$243K$365K$487K$584K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 232 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.3%-14.4%0.1%11.4%
P72
Net-to-Gross49.9%19.4%30.6%49.7%
P75
Occupancy72.3%33.2%56.1%72.4%
P75
Rev/Bed$667K$318K$544K$1.1M
P61
Exp/Bed$598K$327K$492K$1.1M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML