Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON BASTROP 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON BASTROP
CCN 670143 | TX | 7 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$876K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$876K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$639K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$876K
Modeled Uplift
$546K
Risk-Adjusted
-$330K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$333K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$330K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$203K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$876K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$333K$333K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$321K$9K$330K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$152K$203K$639K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$83K$167K$250K$333K$333K$333K$333K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$165K$247K$330K$330K$330K$330K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$135K$203K$203K$203K$203K$203K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$239K$477K$710K$876K$876K$876K$876K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $876K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M12.2%
Year 1$2.1M+$584K$2.7M16.1%
Year 2$2.2M+$876K$3.0M18.2%
Year 3$2.2M+$876K$3.1M18.6%
Year 4$2.3M+$876K$3.2M19.0%
Year 5$2.4M+$876K$3.2M19.4%
$20.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.2M
Value Created
$3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$3.2M
Organic Growth
$8.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$167K$250K$333K$400K
Denial Rate Reductio$165K$247K$330K$396K
A/R Days Reduction$101K$152K$203K$243K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$438K$657K$876K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-50.0%-40.3%-8.8%
P87
Net-to-Gross11.8%23.9%56.5%77.5%
P9
Occupancy13.4%9.6%13.9%23.4%
P48
Rev/Bed$2.4M$458K$733K$1.8M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.1M$786K$1.2M$1.8M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML