Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HERITAGE PARK SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HERITAGE PARK SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 670076 | TX | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $10.1M → Pro Forma $12.8M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$52.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$913K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$639K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$161K$478K$639K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$263K$525K$788K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$260K$520K$780K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$213K$426K$639K$639K$639K$639K$639K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$753K$1.5M$2.2M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.1M$10.1M19.2%
Year 1$10.4M+$1.8M$12.2M23.2%
Year 2$10.7M+$2.8M$13.5M25.6%
Year 3$11.0M+$2.8M$13.8M26.2%
Year 4$11.3M+$2.8M$14.1M26.8%
Year 5$11.7M+$2.8M$14.4M27.5%
$100.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$158.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.1M
Value Created
$14.4M
Exit EBITDA
$16.0M
Organic Growth
$27.6M
RCM Value Creation
$14.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$525K$788K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$520K$780K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$320K$480K$639K$767K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$34K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 98 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-44.5%-16.8%8.9%
P84
Net-to-Gross24.3%24.2%41.5%60.4%
P26
Occupancy24.4%11.0%19.2%42.3%
P59
Rev/Bed$4.4M$479K$838K$1.8M
P95
Exp/Bed$3.5M$660K$1.1M$2.0M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML