Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR PARK REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR PARK REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 670043 | TX | 115 beds | Current EBITDA $17.5M → Pro Forma $26.5M (+$9.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$172.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$26.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$9.1M
Modeled Uplift
$6.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.3M (vs $9.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$110K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$95K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$530K$1.6M$2.1M$6.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$110K$110K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$863K$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$855K$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$700K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$55K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.5M$17.5M10.1%
Year 1$18.0M+$6.1M$24.0M13.9%
Year 2$18.5M+$9.1M$27.6M16.0%
Year 3$19.1M+$9.1M$28.2M16.3%
Year 4$19.6M+$9.1M$28.7M16.6%
Year 5$20.2M+$9.1M$29.3M17.0%
$174.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$322.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$147.9M
Value Created
$29.3M
Exit EBITDA
$27.8M
Organic Growth
$90.8M
RCM Value Creation
$29.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$55K$83K$110K$133K
Total$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$10.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 188 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.1%-9.2%2.2%11.6%
P71
Net-to-Gross17.0%16.1%24.4%36.6%
P30
Occupancy58.4%46.4%62.5%75.5%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.5M$317K$605K$1.3M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.3M$337K$616K$1.2M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML