Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON WILLIAMSON 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON WILLIAMSON
CCN 670041 | TX | 181 beds | Current EBITDA $23.1M → Pro Forma $36.4M (+$13.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$251.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$23.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$13.3M
Modeled Uplift
$9.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.6M (vs $13.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$161K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.0M$5.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.8M$139K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$773K$2.3M$3.1M$9.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$161K$161K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$81K$161K$161K$161K$161K$161K$161K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.7M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x
9.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$23.1M$23.1M9.2%
Year 1$23.8M+$8.8M$32.6M13.0%
Year 2$24.5M+$13.3M$37.8M15.0%
Year 3$25.3M+$13.3M$38.5M15.3%
Year 4$26.0M+$13.3M$39.3M15.6%
Year 5$26.8M+$13.3M$40.0M15.9%
$231.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$440.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$209.4M
Value Created
$40.0M
Exit EBITDA
$36.8M
Organic Growth
$132.5M
RCM Value Creation
$40.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$81K$121K$161K$193K
Total$6.6M$9.9M$13.3M$15.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 158 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.2%-9.8%3.3%13.6%
P61
Net-to-Gross14.1%13.8%19.4%29.3%
P26
Occupancy77.8%49.6%64.4%73.9%
P82
Rev/Bed$1.4M$501K$1.1M$1.5M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.3M$508K$1.0M$1.4M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML