Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ELKHORN VALLEY REHABILITATION HOSPIT 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ELKHORN VALLEY REHABILITATION HOSPIT
CCN 533027 | WY | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$896K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$896K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$653K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$896K
Modeled Uplift
$633K
Risk-Adjusted
-$263K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$341K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$337K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$207K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$896K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$341K$341K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$328K$9K$337K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$155K$207K$653K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$85K$170K$256K$341K$341K$341K$341K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$84K$169K$253K$337K$337K$337K$337K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$138K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$244K$488K$727K$896K$896K$896K$896K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $896K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M10.2%
Year 1$1.8M+$597K$2.4M14.0%
Year 2$1.8M+$896K$2.7M16.1%
Year 3$1.9M+$896K$2.8M16.4%
Year 4$2.0M+$896K$2.8M16.7%
Year 5$2.0M+$896K$2.9M17.1%
$17.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.6M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$170K$256K$341K$409K
Denial Rate Reductio$169K$253K$337K$405K
A/R Days Reduction$104K$155K$207K$249K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$448K$672K$896K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-14.5%-5.0%0.8%
P88
Net-to-Gross74.8%50.1%58.5%66.5%
P81
Occupancy67.7%17.8%30.8%43.9%
P88
Rev/Bed$426K$912K$1.6M$3.0M
P6
Exp/Bed$383K$1.1M$1.6M$3.4M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML