Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STAR VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STAR VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 531313 | WY | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-385K → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$82.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-385K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$998K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$252K$746K$998K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$410K$820K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$406K$812K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$333K$665K$998K$998K$998K$998K$998K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.3x
Headroom (turns)
113%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 113% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.8x, adding 99.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-385K$-385K-0.5%
Year 1$-396K+$2.9M$2.5M3.0%
Year 2$-408K+$4.3M$3.9M4.8%
Year 3$-421K+$4.3M$3.9M4.7%
Year 4$-433K+$4.3M$3.9M4.7%
Year 5$-446K+$4.3M$3.9M4.7%
$-3.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.4M
Value Created
$3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-613K
Organic Growth
$43.1M
RCM Value Creation
$3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$820K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$812K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$499K$748K$998K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$63K
Total$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.5%-21.2%-11.7%-1.8%
P83
Net-to-Gross66.7%58.2%62.8%66.7%
P72
Occupancy28.7%18.5%26.6%37.7%
P50
Rev/Bed$3.7M$960K$1.5M$2.0M
P89
Exp/Bed$3.7M$1.1M$1.6M$2.4M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML