Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CODY REGIONAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CODY REGIONAL HEALTH
CCN 531312 | WY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $5.3M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$122.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$79K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$377K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$79K$79K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$614K$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$608K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$498K$996K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.2M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.4x
Headroom (turns)
129%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 129% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.9x, adding 100.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-0.9%
Year 1$-1.2M+$4.3M$3.1M2.5%
Year 2$-1.2M+$6.5M$5.2M4.3%
Year 3$-1.3M+$6.5M$5.2M4.2%
Year 4$-1.3M+$6.5M$5.2M4.2%
Year 5$-1.3M+$6.5M$5.1M4.2%
$-11.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$56.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.9M
Value Created
$5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$64.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$747K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$59K$79K$94K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.9%-21.0%-9.4%-1.8%
P78
Net-to-Gross57.8%57.1%61.9%66.5%
P28
Occupancy59.6%18.5%26.6%37.3%
P83
Rev/Bed$4.9M$960K$1.5M$2.6M
P94
Exp/Bed$5.0M$1.1M$1.6M$2.7M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML