Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CONVERSE COUNTY 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CONVERSE COUNTY
CCN 531302 | WY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.7M → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$4.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$92.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$4.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$59K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$285K$844K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$59K$59K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$464K$927K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$459K$918K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$376K$752K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.2x
Headroom (turns)
172%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 172% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.7x, adding 103.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.7M$-1.7M-1.9%
Year 1$-1.8M+$3.3M$1.5M1.6%
Year 2$-1.8M+$4.9M$3.0M3.3%
Year 3$-1.9M+$4.9M$3.0M3.2%
Year 4$-2.0M+$4.9M$2.9M3.1%
Year 5$-2.0M+$4.9M$2.9M3.1%
$-17.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.9M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.8M
Organic Growth
$48.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$927K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$918K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$564K$846K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$59K$71K
Total$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.9%-21.0%-9.4%-1.8%
P67
Net-to-Gross45.7%57.1%61.9%66.5%
P11
Occupancy32.9%18.5%26.6%37.3%
P56
Rev/Bed$3.7M$960K$1.5M$2.6M
P83
Exp/Bed$3.8M$1.1M$1.6M$2.7M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML