Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN
CCN 523300 | WI | 298 beds | Current EBITDA $39.9M → Pro Forma $81.7M (+$41.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$795.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$39.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$41.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$81.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$30.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$41.8M
Modeled Uplift
$29.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.1M (vs $41.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$509K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$41.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.9M$15.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.3M$437K$15.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.2M$9.7M$30.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$509K$509K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.0M$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.8M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.2M$6.5M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$254K$509K$509K$509K$509K$509K$509K
Cumulative$0$11.4M$22.8M$33.9M$41.8M$41.8M$41.8M$41.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
9.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
10.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.3x69% / 14.0x
11.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
12.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$39.9M$39.9M5.0%
Year 1$41.1M+$27.9M$68.9M8.7%
Year 2$42.3M+$41.8M$84.1M10.6%
Year 3$43.6M+$41.8M$85.4M10.7%
Year 4$44.9M+$41.8M$86.7M10.9%
Year 5$46.2M+$41.8M$88.0M11.1%
$398.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$968.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$569.8M
Value Created
$88.0M
Exit EBITDA
$63.5M
Organic Growth
$418.3M
RCM Value Creation
$88.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$19.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.9M$11.8M$15.7M$18.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.8M$7.3M$9.7M$11.6M
Clean Claim Rate$254K$382K$509K$611K
Total$20.9M$31.4M$41.8M$50.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.0%-12.3%0.9%6.0%
P70
Net-to-Gross54.3%28.4%33.5%38.1%
P88
Occupancy64.7%49.8%60.5%65.9%
P68
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.2M$1.5M$2.7M
P71
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.3M$1.7M$2.6M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML