Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH -MADISON 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH -MADISON
CCN 522008 | WI | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$935K
Risk-Adjusted
-$455K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$529K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$523K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$322K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$529K$529K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$509K$15K$523K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$241K$322K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$132K$264K$396K$529K$529K$529K$529K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$131K$262K$393K$523K$523K$523K$523K
A/R Days Reduction$0$107K$214K$322K$322K$322K$322K$322K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$379K$757K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x
9.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.2x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
10.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
11.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
12.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M4.7%
Year 1$1.3M+$927K$2.2M8.4%
Year 2$1.3M+$1.4M$2.7M10.3%
Year 3$1.4M+$1.4M$2.8M10.4%
Year 4$1.4M+$1.4M$2.8M10.6%
Year 5$1.4M+$1.4M$2.8M10.7%
$12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.7M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$13.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$264K$396K$529K$634K
Denial Rate Reductio$262K$393K$523K$628K
A/R Days Reduction$161K$241K$322K$386K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$695K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.7%-12.5%-3.7%14.7%
P65
Net-to-Gross20.1%28.4%33.1%38.3%
P6
Occupancy52.3%33.1%51.3%62.1%
P62
Rev/Bed$456K$622K$1.8M$2.6M
P13
Exp/Bed$434K$782K$1.7M$2.7M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML