Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASPIRUS MERRILL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASPIRUS MERRILL HOSPITAL
CCN 521339 | WI | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $3.5M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$971K
Risk-Adjusted
-$436K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$535K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$529K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$325K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$535K$535K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$515K$15K$529K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$243K$325K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$134K$267K$401K$535K$535K$535K$535K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$132K$265K$397K$529K$529K$529K$529K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$217K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$383K$766K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.5M$3.5M13.1%
Year 1$3.6M+$938K$4.5M17.0%
Year 2$3.7M+$1.4M$5.1M19.1%
Year 3$3.8M+$1.4M$5.2M19.5%
Year 4$3.9M+$1.4M$5.3M20.0%
Year 5$4.0M+$1.4M$5.5M20.4%
$34.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$60.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.1M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$5.6M
Organic Growth
$14.1M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$267K$401K$535K$642K
Denial Rate Reductio$265K$397K$529K$635K
A/R Days Reduction$163K$244K$325K$390K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$703K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-19.0%-1.3%9.0%
P79
Net-to-Gross44.9%38.2%45.7%53.0%
P46
Occupancy51.4%25.7%43.8%49.8%
P76
Rev/Bed$2.2M$882K$1.9M$2.9M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.7M$2.6M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML