Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA BAYCARE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA BAYCARE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 520193 | WI | 190 beds | Current EBITDA $97.9M → Pro Forma $127.3M (+$29.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$558.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$97.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$127.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$29.4M
Modeled Uplift
$21.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.0M (vs $29.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$357K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.2M$11.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.7M$307K$11.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.1M$6.8M$21.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$357K$357K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$179K$357K$357K$357K$357K$357K$357K
Cumulative$0$8.0M$16.0M$23.8M$29.4M$29.4M$29.4M$29.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$97.9M$97.9M17.6%
Year 1$100.9M+$19.6M$120.4M21.6%
Year 2$103.9M+$29.4M$133.3M23.9%
Year 3$107.0M+$29.4M$136.4M24.4%
Year 4$110.2M+$29.4M$139.6M25.0%
Year 5$113.5M+$29.4M$142.9M25.6%
$979.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.57B
Exit EV (11x)
$592.4M
Value Created
$142.9M
Exit EBITDA
$156.0M
Organic Growth
$293.6M
RCM Value Creation
$142.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$179K$268K$357K$429K
Total$14.7M$22.0M$29.4M$35.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.6%-12.4%-1.1%5.6%
P94
Net-to-Gross31.4%28.3%33.9%38.2%
P42
Occupancy64.1%47.3%59.3%64.5%
P71
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.1M$1.8M$2.6M
P85
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$1.7M$2.6M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML