Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AP 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THEDACARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AP
CCN 520160 | WI | 172 beds | Current EBITDA $24.7M → Pro Forma $43.3M (+$18.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$352.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$24.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$43.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$18.5M
Modeled Uplift
$12.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.3M (vs $18.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$225K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.1M$15.0M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$24.7M$24.7M7.0%
Year 1$25.5M+$12.4M$37.8M10.7%
Year 2$26.2M+$18.5M$44.8M12.7%
Year 3$27.0M+$18.5M$45.6M12.9%
Year 4$27.8M+$18.5M$46.4M13.2%
Year 5$28.7M+$18.5M$47.2M13.4%
$247.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$519.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$272.0M
Value Created
$47.2M
Exit EBITDA
$39.4M
Organic Growth
$185.4M
RCM Value Creation
$47.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$169K$225K$271K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.5M$22.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.0%-12.3%0.8%7.2%
P72
Net-to-Gross38.1%28.4%33.1%38.1%
P73
Occupancy45.7%47.3%59.3%64.4%
P18
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.1M$1.8M$2.6M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML