Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCONOMOWOC MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCONOMOWOC MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 520062 | WI | 63 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$6.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$125.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.6M
Modeled Uplift
$4.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.5M (vs $6.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$80K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$69K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$384K$1.1M$1.5M$4.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$80K$80K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$625K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$619K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$507K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x89% / 24.3x94% / 27.4x98% / 30.4x100% / 32.0x102% / 33.5x
9.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 24.0x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.1x97% / 29.4x
10.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.2x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x
11.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.0x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.5x
12.0x72% / 15.1x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
64%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 64% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M2.0%
Year 1$2.6M+$4.4M$7.0M5.6%
Year 2$2.7M+$6.6M$9.3M7.4%
Year 3$2.8M+$6.6M$9.3M7.5%
Year 4$2.8M+$6.6M$9.4M7.5%
Year 5$2.9M+$6.6M$9.5M7.6%
$25.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$104.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.3M
Value Created
$9.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$65.8M
RCM Value Creation
$9.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$761K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$60K$80K$96K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.0%-16.2%-4.8%12.8%
P65
Net-to-Gross27.3%28.4%33.1%38.5%
P15
Occupancy48.3%33.1%51.3%62.1%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.0M$622K$1.8M$2.5M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.9M$782K$1.7M$2.7M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML