Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF BURLINGTON 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF BURLINGTON
CCN 520059 | WI | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $18.1M → Pro Forma $24.4M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$118.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.9M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$76K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$365K$1.1M$1.4M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$76K$76K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$594K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$588K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$482K$964K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.1M$18.1M15.3%
Year 1$18.7M+$4.2M$22.9M19.2%
Year 2$19.3M+$6.3M$25.5M21.5%
Year 3$19.8M+$6.3M$26.1M21.9%
Year 4$20.4M+$6.3M$26.7M22.4%
Year 5$21.0M+$6.3M$27.3M23.0%
$181.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$300.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$118.7M
Value Created
$27.3M
Exit EBITDA
$28.9M
Organic Growth
$62.5M
RCM Value Creation
$27.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$723K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$57K$76K$91K
Total$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 85 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.3%-9.5%1.6%8.3%
P90
Net-to-Gross27.4%36.3%43.6%51.2%
P8
Occupancy83.9%28.1%40.1%51.3%
P98
Rev/Bed$3.6M$976K$2.0M$3.0M
P87
Exp/Bed$3.1M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML