Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. NICHOLAS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. NICHOLAS HOSPITAL
CCN 520044 | WI | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.2M → Pro Forma $-3.2M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$114.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$3.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.9M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$63K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$352K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$574K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$568K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$465K$931K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$37K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.2M$-9.2M-8.0%
Year 1$-9.5M+$4.0M$-5.5M-4.8%
Year 2$-9.8M+$6.0M$-3.7M-3.3%
Year 3$-10.1M+$6.0M$-4.0M-3.5%
Year 4$-10.4M+$6.0M$-4.3M-3.8%
Year 5$-10.7M+$6.0M$-4.6M-4.0%
$-92.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-51.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.1M
Value Created
$-4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.7M
Organic Growth
$60.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$698K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$37K$55K$73K$88K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.0%-12.7%-4.4%15.3%
P42
Net-to-Gross32.3%28.2%33.2%38.3%
P41
Occupancy31.6%32.4%50.3%62.8%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.2M$622K$1.9M$2.6M
P63
Exp/Bed$2.3M$734K$1.7M$2.7M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML