Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER - HARTFORD 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER - HARTFORD
CCN 520038 | WI | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $14.9M → Pro Forma $18.9M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$74.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$909K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$229K$680K$909K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$373K$747K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$370K$739K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$303K$606K$909K$909K$909K$909K$909K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.9M$14.9M20.0%
Year 1$15.4M+$2.6M$18.0M24.1%
Year 2$15.9M+$3.9M$19.8M26.5%
Year 3$16.3M+$3.9M$20.3M27.1%
Year 4$16.8M+$3.9M$20.8M27.8%
Year 5$17.3M+$3.9M$21.3M28.5%
$149.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$233.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.4M
Value Created
$21.3M
Exit EBITDA
$23.8M
Organic Growth
$39.3M
RCM Value Creation
$21.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$747K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$739K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$454K$682K$909K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$57K
Total$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.0%-9.0%2.0%8.5%
P91
Net-to-Gross28.1%36.2%43.6%51.4%
P11
Occupancy36.4%28.4%40.1%51.5%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.1M$995K$2.0M$3.0M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML