Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARSHFIELD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARSHFIELD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 520037 | WI | 194 beds | Current EBITDA $-99.7M → Pro Forma $-59.4M (+$40.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$765.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-99.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-59.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$40.3M
Modeled Uplift
$31.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.8M (vs $40.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$490K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.3M$15.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.7M$421K$15.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$7.0M$9.3M$29.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$490K$490K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$245K$490K$490K$490K$490K$490K$490K
Cumulative$0$11.0M$21.9M$32.7M$40.3M$40.3M$40.3M$40.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-99.7M$-99.7M-13.0%
Year 1$-102.7M+$26.9M$-75.9M-9.9%
Year 2$-105.8M+$40.3M$-65.5M-8.6%
Year 3$-109.0M+$40.3M$-68.7M-9.0%
Year 4$-112.2M+$40.3M$-72.0M-9.4%
Year 5$-115.6M+$40.3M$-75.3M-9.8%
$-997.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-828.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$168.7M
Value Created
$-75.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-158.8M
Organic Growth
$402.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-75.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M
A/R Days Reduction$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
Clean Claim Rate$245K$368K$490K$588K
Total$20.1M$30.2M$40.3M$48.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.0%-12.3%-3.0%5.1%
P21
Net-to-Gross37.3%27.4%33.5%38.2%
P65
Occupancy96.0%47.4%59.1%64.4%
P97
Rev/Bed$3.9M$1.1M$1.7M$2.5M
P94
Exp/Bed$4.5M$1.2M$1.7M$2.6M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML