Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FROEDTERT SOUTH 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FROEDTERT SOUTH
CCN 520021 | WI | 173 beds | Current EBITDA $14.7M → Pro Forma $34.3M (+$19.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$372.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$19.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.9M (vs $19.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$238K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$205K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$238K$238K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.7M$15.9M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 15.0x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.0x
9.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
10.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.2x
11.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x
12.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.7M$14.7M3.9%
Year 1$15.1M+$13.1M$28.2M7.6%
Year 2$15.6M+$19.6M$35.2M9.5%
Year 3$16.1M+$19.6M$35.6M9.6%
Year 4$16.5M+$19.6M$36.1M9.7%
Year 5$17.0M+$19.6M$36.6M9.8%
$147.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$402.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$255.9M
Value Created
$36.6M
Exit EBITDA
$23.4M
Organic Growth
$195.8M
RCM Value Creation
$36.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$179K$238K$286K
Total$9.8M$14.7M$19.6M$23.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.9%-12.3%0.8%7.2%
P62
Net-to-Gross33.1%28.4%33.1%38.1%
P48
Occupancy43.1%47.3%59.3%64.4%
P12
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.1M$1.8M$2.6M
P64
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML