Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WAUKESHA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WAUKESHA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 520008 | WI | 270 beds | Current EBITDA $17.6M → Pro Forma $46.3M (+$28.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$545.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$46.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$28.7M
Modeled Uplift
$19.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.7M (vs $28.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$349K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.9M$10.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.5M$300K$10.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.6M$20.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$349K$349K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$175K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K
Cumulative$0$7.8M$15.6M$23.3M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x89% / 24.0x
9.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
10.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x78% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
11.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x75% / 16.6x
12.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
51%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 51% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.6M$17.6M3.2%
Year 1$18.1M+$19.1M$37.2M6.8%
Year 2$18.7M+$28.7M$47.4M8.7%
Year 3$19.2M+$28.7M$47.9M8.8%
Year 4$19.8M+$28.7M$48.5M8.9%
Year 5$20.4M+$28.7M$49.1M9.0%
$175.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$539.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$364.1M
Value Created
$49.1M
Exit EBITDA
$28.0M
Organic Growth
$287.0M
RCM Value Creation
$49.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$175K$262K$349K$419K
Total$14.4M$21.5M$28.7M$34.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.2%-12.3%0.9%5.1%
P60
Net-to-Gross28.4%28.3%33.5%38.2%
P27
Occupancy60.5%48.8%60.5%65.3%
P48
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.5M$2.5M
P62
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.7M$2.6M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML