Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PLEASANT VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PLEASANT VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 510012 | WV | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.2M → Pro Forma $-17.1M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-17.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$761K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$797K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$789K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$485K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$797K$797K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$767K$22K$789K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$122K$363K$485K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$199K$399K$598K$797K$797K$797K$797K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$197K$395K$592K$789K$789K$789K$789K
A/R Days Reduction$0$162K$323K$485K$485K$485K$485K$485K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$571K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.2M$-19.2M-48.1%
Year 1$-19.7M+$1.4M$-18.3M-46.0%
Year 2$-20.3M+$2.1M$-18.2M-45.7%
Year 3$-20.9M+$2.1M$-18.8M-47.3%
Year 4$-21.6M+$2.1M$-19.5M-48.8%
Year 5$-22.2M+$2.1M$-20.1M-50.5%
$-191.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-221.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-29.7M
Value Created
$-20.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-30.5M
Organic Growth
$21.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$399K$598K$797K$957K
Denial Rate Reductio$395K$592K$789K$947K
A/R Days Reduction$243K$364K$485K$582K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-48.1%-13.1%1.3%10.4%
P3
Net-to-Gross26.9%28.9%42.8%55.8%
P19
Occupancy33.5%28.2%40.5%64.1%
P32
Rev/Bed$814K$552K$950K$1.5M
P41
Exp/Bed$1.2M$513K$1.0M$1.3M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML