Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREENBRIER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREENBRIER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 510002 | WV | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$834K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$618K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$977K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$156K$462K$618K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$254K$508K$761K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$251K$502K$754K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$206K$412K$618K$618K$618K$618K$618K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$727K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
9.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.3x
10.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x
11.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
12.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M4.3%
Year 1$2.3M+$1.8M$4.0M8.0%
Year 2$2.3M+$2.7M$5.0M9.9%
Year 3$2.4M+$2.7M$5.1M10.0%
Year 4$2.5M+$2.7M$5.1M10.1%
Year 5$2.5M+$2.7M$5.2M10.3%
$22.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$57.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.4M
Value Created
$5.2M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$26.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$508K$761K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$502K$754K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$309K$463K$618K$741K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-10.8%6.2%13.5%
P45
Net-to-Gross29.3%23.6%31.5%47.2%
P45
Occupancy58.5%40.5%65.3%84.9%
P33
Rev/Bed$875K$458K$544K$937K
P70
Exp/Bed$837K$416K$513K$1.0M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML