Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INLAND NORTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INLAND NORTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 504014 | WA | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $-644K → Pro Forma $726K (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-644K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$726K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$999K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$924K
Risk-Adjusted
-$446K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$521K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$516K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$317K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$521K$521K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$501K$14K$516K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$237K$317K$999K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$130K$260K$391K$521K$521K$521K$521K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$129K$258K$387K$516K$516K$516K$516K
A/R Days Reduction$0$106K$211K$317K$317K$317K$317K$317K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$373K$746K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
14.0x
Headroom (turns)
215%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 215% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -7.5x, adding 106.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-644K$-644K-2.5%
Year 1$-663K+$913K$250K1.0%
Year 2$-683K+$1.4M$687K2.6%
Year 3$-704K+$1.4M$666K2.6%
Year 4$-725K+$1.4M$645K2.5%
Year 5$-746K+$1.4M$623K2.4%
$-6.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.3M
Value Created
$623K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$13.7M
RCM Value Creation
$623K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$260K$391K$521K$625K
Denial Rate Reductio$258K$387K$516K$619K
A/R Days Reduction$158K$238K$317K$380K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$17K$20K
Total$685K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.5%-21.1%-10.4%-2.5%
P72
Net-to-Gross46.8%23.5%27.1%36.7%
P90
Occupancy62.6%56.0%69.5%84.2%
P38
Rev/Bed$260K$497K$1.3M$2.3M
P3
Exp/Bed$267K$542K$1.6M$2.5M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML