Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL FIRST HILL 2026-04-26 08:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL FIRST HILL
CCN 502002 | WA | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.7M → Pro Forma $511K (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$511K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$663K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$834K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$826K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$507K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$834K$834K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$803K$23K$826K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$128K$380K$507K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$209K$417K$626K$834K$834K$834K$834K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$206K$413K$619K$826K$826K$826K$826K
A/R Days Reduction$0$169K$338K$507K$507K$507K$507K$507K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$597K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-27.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
34.4x
Headroom (turns)
529%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 529% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -27.9x, adding 126.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.7M$-1.7M-4.0%
Year 1$-1.7M+$1.5M$-271K-0.6%
Year 2$-1.8M+$2.2M$409K1.0%
Year 3$-1.8M+$2.2M$355K0.9%
Year 4$-1.9M+$2.2M$300K0.7%
Year 5$-2.0M+$2.2M$243K0.6%
$-16.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.5M
Value Created
$243K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.7M
Organic Growth
$21.9M
RCM Value Creation
$243K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$417K$626K$834K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$413K$619K$826K$991K
A/R Days Reduction$254K$381K$507K$609K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-18.2%-9.7%-2.2%
P67
Net-to-Gross22.7%23.5%27.3%36.3%
P20
Occupancy67.3%52.1%66.0%80.3%
P50
Rev/Bed$521K$503K$1.4M$2.2M
P27
Exp/Bed$542K$546K$1.6M$2.3M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML