Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CASCADE VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CASCADE VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 500060 | WA | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $16.9M → Pro Forma $21.1M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$79.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$964K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$243K$721K$964K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$396K$792K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$392K$784K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$321K$643K$964K$964K$964K$964K$964K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.9M$16.9M21.3%
Year 1$17.4M+$2.8M$20.2M25.5%
Year 2$17.9M+$4.2M$22.1M27.9%
Year 3$18.5M+$4.2M$22.6M28.6%
Year 4$19.0M+$4.2M$23.2M29.3%
Year 5$19.6M+$4.2M$23.8M30.0%
$169.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$261.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$92.4M
Value Created
$23.8M
Exit EBITDA
$26.9M
Organic Growth
$41.7M
RCM Value Creation
$23.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$792K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$784K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$482K$723K$964K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.3%-13.7%-9.0%-3.6%
P95
Net-to-Gross29.1%32.0%44.0%59.2%
P17
Occupancy47.9%44.6%51.8%67.1%
P31
Rev/Bed$1.7M$701K$1.8M$3.0M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.3M$784K$2.0M$3.2M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML