Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500039 | WA | 238 beds | Current EBITDA $14.5M → Pro Forma $48.9M (+$34.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$653.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$48.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$34.4M
Modeled Uplift
$26.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.4M (vs $34.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$418K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.1M$13.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.6M$359K$12.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$5.9M$8.0M$25.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$418K$418K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.2M$6.5M$9.7M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$209K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K
Cumulative$0$9.4M$18.7M$27.9M$34.4M$34.4M$34.4M$34.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.4x95% / 28.3x97% / 29.7x99% / 31.2x
9.0x82% / 19.7x86% / 22.2x90% / 24.8x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.4x
10.0x77% / 17.4x82% / 19.7x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.3x
11.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x
12.0x69% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x82% / 19.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.5M$14.5M2.2%
Year 1$14.9M+$22.9M$37.8M5.8%
Year 2$15.4M+$34.4M$49.8M7.6%
Year 3$15.8M+$34.4M$50.2M7.7%
Year 4$16.3M+$34.4M$50.7M7.8%
Year 5$16.8M+$34.4M$51.2M7.8%
$145.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$563.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$418.0M
Value Created
$51.2M
Exit EBITDA
$23.1M
Organic Growth
$343.7M
RCM Value Creation
$51.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.7M$12.9M$15.5M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.5M
Clean Claim Rate$209K$314K$418K$502K
Total$17.2M$25.8M$34.4M$41.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-14.9%-11.0%-4.4%
P86
Net-to-Gross19.8%24.7%29.0%34.3%
P7
Occupancy90.3%70.5%75.6%90.3%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.6M$2.4M$2.7M
P69
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.7M$2.7M$3.1M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML