Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER CHERRY HILL 2026-04-26 07:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER CHERRY HILL
CCN 500025 | WA | 181 beds | Current EBITDA $-69.7M → Pro Forma $-45.3M (+$24.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$463.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-69.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-45.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$24.4M
Modeled Uplift
$17.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.9M (vs $24.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$297K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.3M$9.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.9M$255K$9.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$297K$297K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$148K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Cumulative$0$6.6M$13.3M$19.8M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-69.7M$-69.7M-15.0%
Year 1$-71.8M+$16.3M$-55.5M-12.0%
Year 2$-73.9M+$24.4M$-49.5M-10.7%
Year 3$-76.1M+$24.4M$-51.8M-11.2%
Year 4$-78.4M+$24.4M$-54.0M-11.7%
Year 5$-80.8M+$24.4M$-56.4M-12.2%
$-696.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-620.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$76.4M
Value Created
$-56.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-111.0M
Organic Growth
$243.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-56.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$148K$222K$297K$356K
Total$12.2M$18.3M$24.4M$29.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.0%-15.8%-10.4%-1.9%
P25
Net-to-Gross26.0%22.8%28.2%31.7%
P39
Occupancy74.1%61.2%73.8%85.7%
P53
Rev/Bed$2.6M$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M
P69
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.5M$2.2M$2.8M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML