Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROV REGL MED CENTER EVERETT 2026-04-26 08:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROV REGL MED CENTER EVERETT
CCN 500014 | WA | 548 beds | Current EBITDA $-161.9M → Pro Forma $-118.4M (+$43.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$825.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-161.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$43.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-118.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$31.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$43.4M
Modeled Uplift
$31.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.2M (vs $43.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$16.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$16.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$528K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$43.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$16.5M$16.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.9M$454K$16.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.5M$7.5M$10.0M$31.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$528K$528K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.4M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$264K$528K$528K$528K$528K$528K$528K
Cumulative$0$11.8M$23.7M$35.2M$43.4M$43.4M$43.4M$43.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $43.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-161.9M$-161.9M-19.6%
Year 1$-166.7M+$29.0M$-137.8M-16.7%
Year 2$-171.7M+$43.4M$-128.3M-15.5%
Year 3$-176.9M+$43.4M$-133.4M-16.2%
Year 4$-182.2M+$43.4M$-138.8M-16.8%
Year 5$-187.6M+$43.4M$-144.2M-17.5%
$-1.62B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.59B
Exit EV (11x)
$32.3M
Value Created
$-144.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-257.8M
Organic Growth
$434.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-144.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.3M$12.4M$16.5M$19.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.2M$12.3M$16.3M$19.6M
A/R Days Reduction$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.1M
Clean Claim Rate$264K$396K$528K$634K
Total$21.7M$32.6M$43.4M$52.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.6%-14.9%-12.2%-9.6%
P6
Net-to-Gross27.2%26.3%29.0%35.4%
P29
Occupancy91.4%74.1%78.3%92.6%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
P6
Exp/Bed$1.8M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML