Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROV ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROV ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 500002 | WA | 95 beds | Current EBITDA $-24.8M → Pro Forma $-13.7M (+$11.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$211.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-24.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$11.1M
Modeled Uplift
$8.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.0M (vs $11.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$135K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$116K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$649K$1.9M$2.6M$8.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$858K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$68K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.1M$9.0M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-24.8M$-24.8M-11.7%
Year 1$-25.5M+$7.4M$-18.1M-8.6%
Year 2$-26.3M+$11.1M$-15.2M-7.2%
Year 3$-27.1M+$11.1M$-16.0M-7.6%
Year 4$-27.9M+$11.1M$-16.8M-7.9%
Year 5$-28.7M+$11.1M$-17.6M-8.3%
$-248.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-193.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.1M
Value Created
$-17.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-39.5M
Organic Growth
$111.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-17.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$68K$102K$135K$162K
Total$5.6M$8.3M$11.1M$13.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.7%-19.7%-9.0%-2.2%
P42
Net-to-Gross30.0%23.6%27.5%35.9%
P58
Occupancy64.7%55.7%69.5%82.9%
P39
Rev/Bed$2.2M$509K$1.4M$2.4M
P68
Exp/Bed$2.5M$549K$1.7M$2.7M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML