Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE TAYLOR TRANSITIONAL CARE HOSPIT 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE TAYLOR TRANSITIONAL CARE HOSPIT
CCN 492001 | VA | 104 beds | Current EBITDA $7.5M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$51.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$854K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$626K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$990K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$158K$468K$626K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$257K$514K$772K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$255K$509K$764K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$209K$417K$626K$626K$626K$626K$626K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$737K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.5M$7.5M14.6%
Year 1$7.7M+$1.8M$9.5M18.5%
Year 2$7.9M+$2.7M$10.7M20.7%
Year 3$8.2M+$2.7M$10.9M21.2%
Year 4$8.4M+$2.7M$11.1M21.7%
Year 5$8.7M+$2.7M$11.4M22.1%
$74.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$125.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.4M
Value Created
$11.4M
Exit EBITDA
$11.9M
Organic Growth
$27.1M
RCM Value Creation
$11.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$514K$772K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$509K$764K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$313K$469K$626K$751K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.6%-7.1%5.9%16.7%
P69
Net-to-Gross74.6%20.6%26.5%32.3%
P94
Occupancy54.6%43.8%64.6%77.5%
P35
Rev/Bed$495K$431K$1.3M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$423K$472K$1.2M$1.8M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML