Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENRICO DOCTORS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENRICO DOCTORS HOSPITAL
CCN 490118 | VA | 686 beds | Current EBITDA $124.7M → Pro Forma $159.5M (+$34.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$660.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$124.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$159.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$34.7M
Modeled Uplift
$20.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.8M (vs $34.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$423K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.2M$13.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.7M$363K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.0M$25.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$423K$423K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$211K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$18.9M$28.2M$34.7M$34.7M$34.7M$34.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$124.7M$124.7M18.9%
Year 1$128.5M+$23.2M$151.6M23.0%
Year 2$132.3M+$34.7M$167.1M25.3%
Year 3$136.3M+$34.7M$171.0M25.9%
Year 4$140.4M+$34.7M$175.1M26.5%
Year 5$144.6M+$34.7M$179.3M27.2%
$1.25B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.97B
Exit EV (11x)
$725.5M
Value Created
$179.3M
Exit EBITDA
$198.7M
Organic Growth
$347.5M
RCM Value Creation
$179.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$211K$317K$423K$507K
Total$17.4M$26.1M$34.7M$41.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.9%-2.8%1.7%16.1%
P73
Net-to-Gross10.6%26.8%31.6%35.8%
P9
Occupancy41.2%71.2%74.8%81.1%
P0
Rev/Bed$963K$1.6M$2.3M$2.7M
P0
Exp/Bed$781K$1.5M$2.0M$2.7M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML