Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA NORTHERN VIRGINIA MED CTR 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA NORTHERN VIRGINIA MED CTR
CCN 490113 | VA | 147 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.3M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$15.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$286.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$15.1M
Modeled Uplift
$11.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.6M (vs $15.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$183K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.7M$5.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$157K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$879K$2.6M$3.5M$11.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$183K$183K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$183K$183K$183K$183K$183K$183K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.2M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-37.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
44.2x
Headroom (turns)
680%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 680% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -37.7x, adding 136.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.3M$-12.3M-4.3%
Year 1$-12.7M+$10.0M$-2.6M-0.9%
Year 2$-13.0M+$15.1M$2.0M0.7%
Year 3$-13.4M+$15.1M$1.6M0.6%
Year 4$-13.8M+$15.1M$1.2M0.4%
Year 5$-14.3M+$15.1M$803K0.3%
$-123.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$131.8M
Value Created
$803K
Exit EBITDA
$-19.6M
Organic Growth
$150.6M
RCM Value Creation
$803K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$137K$183K$220K
Total$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.3%-4.9%6.0%15.1%
P27
Net-to-Gross28.1%20.6%25.6%30.2%
P67
Occupancy95.4%46.7%66.6%78.5%
P96
Rev/Bed$1.9M$570K$1.6M$1.9M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.0M$611K$1.4M$1.8M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML