Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DANVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 490075 | VA | 232 beds | Current EBITDA $24.1M → Pro Forma $42.6M (+$18.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$352.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$24.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$18.5M
Modeled Uplift
$12.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.2M (vs $18.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$225K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.1M$15.0M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x66% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
10.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
12.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$24.1M$24.1M6.8%
Year 1$24.8M+$12.3M$37.2M10.6%
Year 2$25.6M+$18.5M$44.1M12.5%
Year 3$26.3M+$18.5M$44.9M12.7%
Year 4$27.1M+$18.5M$45.7M13.0%
Year 5$27.9M+$18.5M$46.5M13.2%
$241.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$511.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$270.1M
Value Created
$46.5M
Exit EBITDA
$38.4M
Organic Growth
$185.2M
RCM Value Creation
$46.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$169K$225K$270K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.5M$22.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.8%-3.3%5.5%14.8%
P53
Net-to-Gross20.6%23.6%27.4%35.0%
P16
Occupancy47.1%60.5%72.3%80.5%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$1.8M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML