Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 490053 | VA | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $11.5M → Pro Forma $21.4M (+$9.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$188.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$9.9M
Modeled Uplift
$7.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.2M (vs $9.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$121K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$104K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$578K$1.7M$2.3M$7.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$121K$121K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$942K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$932K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$764K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$60K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.8x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
12.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.5M$11.5M6.1%
Year 1$11.8M+$6.6M$18.4M9.8%
Year 2$12.2M+$9.9M$22.1M11.7%
Year 3$12.5M+$9.9M$22.4M11.9%
Year 4$12.9M+$9.9M$22.8M12.1%
Year 5$13.3M+$9.9M$23.2M12.3%
$114.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$255.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$140.5M
Value Created
$23.2M
Exit EBITDA
$18.2M
Organic Growth
$99.1M
RCM Value Creation
$23.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$60K$90K$121K$145K
Total$5.0M$7.4M$9.9M$11.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.1%-6.0%6.7%15.1%
P48
Net-to-Gross21.8%21.1%26.7%34.3%
P28
Occupancy74.0%43.8%64.6%81.0%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.9M$431K$1.1M$1.9M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.8M$456K$1.0M$1.8M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML