Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARILION NEW RIVER VALLEY MED CENTER 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARILION NEW RIVER VALLEY MED CENTER
CCN 490042 | VA | 94 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $12.6M (+$13.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$261.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$13.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.5M (vs $13.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$167K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$144K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$802K$2.4M$3.2M$10.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$167K$167K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$84K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.5M$11.1M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.3x
Headroom (turns)
112%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 112% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.8x, adding 99.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-0.5%
Year 1$-1.2M+$9.2M$7.9M3.0%
Year 2$-1.3M+$13.7M$12.5M4.8%
Year 3$-1.3M+$13.7M$12.4M4.8%
Year 4$-1.3M+$13.7M$12.4M4.7%
Year 5$-1.4M+$13.7M$12.4M4.7%
$-11.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$136.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$147.9M
Value Created
$12.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$137.5M
RCM Value Creation
$12.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$84K$125K$167K$201K
Total$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$16.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.5%-6.0%6.7%15.1%
P39
Net-to-Gross28.8%21.1%26.7%32.3%
P63
Occupancy84.4%43.5%63.2%78.5%
P81
Rev/Bed$2.8M$431K$960K$1.9M
P96
Exp/Bed$2.8M$456K$998K$1.7M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML